All Formats
Lincoln-Douglas Debate
LD
One-on-one values debate. Philosophy meets policy.
Sides
1v1 (Aff vs Neg)
Round length
~45 min
Topic
New every 2 months
Focus
Values + frameworks
Overview
LD is the philosopher's event. You debate moral and political values — justice, liberty, equality — using a framework (Value + Criterion) that tells the judge HOW to evaluate the round. Cases are dense, cross-ex is sharp, and the best LDers win by controlling the framework, not by piling on cards.
Speech order
Standard NSDA LD round.
- •Aff Constructive (6 min)
- •Neg Cross-ex of Aff (3 min)
- •Neg Constructive (7 min) — case + line-by-line on Aff
- •Aff Cross-ex of Neg (3 min)
- •1st Aff Rebuttal (4 min) — must answer ALL Neg arguments
- •Neg Rebuttal (6 min) — extend, weigh, crystallize
- •2nd Aff Rebuttal (3 min) — final word, weigh everything
- •Prep time: 4 min each, used between speeches
Case prep workflow
An LD case is built once per topic and refined over weeks.
- •Pick a Value (the moral goal: justice, morality, autonomy).
- •Pick a Criterion (the test for the value: maximizing X, protecting Y).
- •Write 2 contentions that prove your side best achieves the criterion.
- •Pre-write framework answers: what if they win their criterion?
- •Build a 'weighing block': why your impacts outweigh under their framework too.
Framework: V.C.C.I.
The skeleton of every LD case.
- •V — Value: the moral standard the round should be judged on.
- •C — Criterion: how we measure achievement of that value.
- •C — Contentions: arguments that prove you meet the criterion.
- •I — Impacts: the real-world stakes that flow from each contention.
Common mistakes
- ✕Ignoring the framework debate and just trading impacts
- ✕Picking a value (justice) and a criterion (justice) — they need to be different
- ✕Running out of time in the 1AR — pre-time your rebuttals
- ✕Dropping a Neg argument in 1AR — extending it in 2AR is too late
- ✕Using policy-debate jargon (DA, CP, K) without explaining it
Drills
- →Framework drill: write 3 different V/C pairs for the same case.
- →1AR pressure: run a 4-min 1AR against 7 min of Neg arguments. Daily.
- →Voter drill: end every practice with a 60-second 'voters' speech.
- →Cross-ex tagging: in CX, get the opponent to commit to a definition you can use later.
Sample prompts
Resolved: A just government ought to provide a universal basic income.
Resolved: In a democracy, voting ought to be compulsory.
Resolved: The United States ought to guarantee the right to housing.
Resolved: Public colleges and universities ought to abolish standardized testing.