Writing a Full Weighing Analysis
A complete weighing analysis names the mechanism, applies it to both sides' impacts, and states the conclusion for the ballot. You will be able to write a full weighing paragraph ready for Summary or Final Focus.
The Three-Step Structure
Step one: name the weighing mechanism you're using (for example, 'we should weigh probability first'). Step two: apply it explicitly to both sides' impacts, not just your own — comparison requires acknowledging the other side's claim. Step three: state the voting conclusion in a single clear sentence, such as 'that's why you vote Pro.'
Common Weighing Mistakes
A frequent error is naming a mechanism but never actually applying it to the opponent's impact, leaving the comparison one-sided and unconvincing. Another is stacking every mechanism without prioritizing any of them, which can leave the judge without clear guidance on which one should decide the round if they conflict.
A debater is writing a Final Focus weighing paragraph on a healthcare topic.
'You should weigh magnitude first in this round. Con's harm affects a subset of patients in one care setting, while our impact affects every uninsured American, over 25 million people, with a proven mortality reduction. Even if you find their concern sympathetic, the sheer scope and severity of our impact means you weigh our side first and vote Pro.' Notice all three steps: naming the mechanism, applying it to both sides, and a clear voting conclusion.
1. What is the final step of a complete weighing analysis?
2. A common weighing mistake is:
Answer all 2 to check.
Name the mechanism, apply it to both sides, and end with a clear voting conclusion — every time.