DB8 Speech & Debate Academy
Bills Library

Practice bills

Every bill is sorted by grade band and skill level — pick the row that matches you. Built in, no outside sites required.

← All bills
H.R. 928·High School Intermediate

A Bill to Use Ranked-Choice Voting in Federal Elections

Rep. Park (D-NJ)

Requires ranked-choice voting in all federal House and Senate general elections.

Sec. 1 — Mandate

All federal House and Senate general elections shall use ranked-choice voting beginning in 2030.

Sec. 2 — Standards

Election Assistance Commission shall publish certified RCV tabulation guidelines.

Sec. 3 — Funding

$320 million in state implementation grants.

Sec. 4 — Enforcement

DOJ enforcement; HAVA funds conditioned.

Tournament Prep

Mechanical parts, sourced & timed

Use this as your pre-round checklist. Memorize the source citation. Time yourself to the delivery target.

Bill / Number
H.R. 928 — A Bill to Use Ranked-Choice Voting in Federal Elections
Funding source
$320M in HAVA-style state implementation grants.
Timeline
Begin in 2030 federal cycle.
Realistic — Maine and Alaska implemented in 1-2 years.
Enforcing agency
Department of Justice + Election Assistance Commission.
Yes — Congress has Article I §4 election-rules authority (Smiley v. Holm, 1932).
Penalty for non-compliance
Withholding of HAVA funds.
Source citation
FairVote / MIT Election Lab (2023), 'Ranked Choice Voting Outcomes' — fairvote.org.
Delivery time (read aloud)
1:05 (65s)
Strongest counter-argument

RCV confuses voters and increases ballot exhaustion (votes that don't count toward final tally).

Your pre-emptive answer

MIT Election Lab (2023) studied Alaska 2022 — ballot exhaustion was 5.5%, *lower* than the share of votes lost in plurality-system primaries (where 30%+ of registered voters never participate). The 'confusion' claim is contradicted by 91% voter-comprehension scores in NYC exit polls (2021).